Bernard Madoff fails to win compassionate release from prison

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A federal judge on Thursday rejected Bernard Madoff’s request to be released early from prison because he was dying of kidney failure, saying the swindler has never fully accepted responsibility for his massive, decades-long Ponzi scheme.

Circuit Judge Denny Chin, who called Madoff’s crimes “extraordinarily evil” when imposing a 150-year sentence in June 2009, wrote that while Madoff’s failing health was “most unfortunate,” compassionate release was unwarranted.

“When I sentenced Mr. Madoff in 2009, it was fully my intent that he live out the rest of his life in prison,” Chin wrote. “Nothing has happened in the 11 years since to change my thinking.”

The judge called Madoff’s fraud “one of the egregious financial crimes of our time.”

Madoff’s lawyer, Brandon Sample, expressed disappointment that Chin found Madoff “beyond redemption,” and said his client’s last hope was for President Donald Trump to commute his sentence.

Sample has said Madoff, 82, used a wheelchair and had fewer than 18 months to live. The U.S. government opposed early release.

Prosecutors said Madoff used his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, to swindle thousands of individuals, charities, pension funds and hedge funds, including many with ties to the Jewish community.

A court-appointed trustee estimated Madoff’s customers lost $17.5 billion, of which $14.3 billion has been recovered.

Madoff was arrested in December 2008 after admitting his fraud to his sons, and pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts.

About 500 of the 520 victims who wrote to Chin opposed early release, and the judge said Madoff has appeared in public comments to blame them.

“Mr. Madoff was never truly remorseful, and … was only sorry that his life as he knew it was collapsing around him,” Chin wrote.

Madoff sought release under the First Step Act, a 2018 law affording early freedom to some older prisoners, often for health reasons.

The case is U.S. v. Madoff, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-cr-00213.

Source: Read Full Article